UK rules in favor of Craig Wright in BTC.org whitepaper case
3 min readBTC.org, “an informational site dedicated to help educate and facilitate the understanding of BTC,” has lost the right to grant access to BTC’s whitepaper document in the U.K., according to the latest order by London’s High Court.
Per an announcement published yesterday by Ontier LLP, a law firm representing self-proclaimed BTC creator Craig Wright, Judge Hodge QC has granted the latter a default judgment in his “copyright infringement action against ‘Cøbra’, the pseudonymous operator and publisher of the BTC.org website.”
Default judgement awarded to Craig Wright.
Cobra has to put a notice up on https://t.co/4T3OqpAR1A for six months about the default judgement.
Also has to pay Craig’s costs, £35,000 in interim payments ordered so far.
— Output Intern (@Outputintern) June 28, 2021
As CryptoSlate earlier reported, Wright is insisting that he is actually Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic creator of BTC, and even claimed that BTC is his intellectual property a year ago. As such, Wright also argued that the rights to BTC’s whitepaper—a document that explains the crypto’s inner workings—also belong to him.
As part of this effort, Wright claimed that BTC.org, one of the best-known websites dedicated to BTC and currently maintained by pseudonymous user Cøbra, is infringing his intellectual property rights by hosting the whitepaper of BTC—and filed a lawsuit in the U.K. Now, the court’s order made it official.
Fighting for what is Wright
According to Ontier’s announcement, the judge ordered that BTC.org is now prohibited from “infringing Dr Wright’s copyright in the United Kingdom whether by making the White Paper available for download from the BTC.org website or in any other way.”
Additionally, BTC.org is now obliged to publish a copy of the corresponding court order for six months while the “Court also ordered that there be an inquiry as to damages caused by the Defendant’s infringement of Dr Wright’s copyright in the UK.” Finally, Cøbra must compensate Wright’s legal expenses which amounted to around £35,000 ($48,500).
Notably, the judge has no other option but to rule this way—thus the default judgment—because Cøbra simply refused to defend his position in order to retain anonymity. Or, as Ontier put it, “anonymous BTC blogger ‘Cøbra’ stays in the shadows and fails to defend itself in the face of Dr. Wright’s High Court claim.”
Cobra fights for BTC
In his turn, Cøbra said that he will be “happy to pay Craig his costs for the BTC whitepaper case.”
Happy to pay Craig his costs for the BTC whitepaper case.
How does a BTC payment to the address associated with block #9 sound? https://t.co/dxMWIrnkGx
— Cøbra (@CobraBitcoin) June 28, 2021
At the same time, BTC.org maintainer pointed out that court cases such as this are the exact reason why BTC is “necessary.”
I don't think you could get a better advertisement of *why* BTC is necessary than what happened today.
Rules enforced through cryptography are far more superior than rules based on whoever can spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in court.
— Cøbra (@CobraBitcoin) June 28, 2021
“I don’t think you could get a better advertisement of *why* BTC is necessary than what happened today. Rules enforced through cryptography are far more superior than rules based on whoever can spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in court,” Cøbra tweeted today.
Sucks when you have billionaires determined to bury you in endless frivolous litigation.
I'm going to take a break from Twitter for a while. Appreciate all the kind words. Take care.
https://t.co/EOGI8dVQet
— Cøbra (@CobraBitcoin) June 28, 2021
He added that today’s systems are “where ‘justice’ depends on who’s got the bigger wallet” and that it “sucks when you have billionaires determined to bury you in endless frivolous litigation.”
The post UK rules in favor of Craig Wright in BTC.org whitepaper case appeared first on CryptoSlate.
