Texas Crypto Law Proposal Has One Major Flaw, Experts Say
2 min read
While positive for the industry overall, new crypto-friendly amendments to the law proposed in Texas could lead to “a lien mess” for BTC holders, Caitlin Long, CEO of crypto bank Avanti, <a href=”https://twitter.com/CaitlinLong/status/1375309602338664457″>noted today.
Introduced in mid-March, House Bill 4474 aims to adapt the existing laws to emerging technologies such as blockchain and digital assets. Namely, HB 4474 proposes to clarify the definitions of digital currencies and of control over them under commercial law.
“First, IT’S AWESOME that Texas is likely to become 2nd state to treat BTC the same as money under US commercial law,” Long tweeted, adding, “For lawyers out there Texas is proposing to apply the UCC ‘take free’ rules, which means innocent purchasers of BTC & other virtual currencies take free of any adverse claims as long as they didn’t defraud the seller. THIS IS A BIG DEAL!”
However, unlike in Wyoming, America’s crypto-friendliest state—where Avanti itself received a banking license—Texas’s proposal arguably has a major flaw: it doesn’t explicitly state how lenders can enforce their liens on BTC.
Over the past year, crypto-related lending in various forms has become a major, fast-growing part of the crypto industry. One of the best examples of this is ETH’s booming decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem—where the biggest platforms, such as MakerDAO, Compound, and Aave are all focused on lending.
“It still has a gaping hole. I’d encourage Texas to amend HB4474 to incorporate Wyoming’s language around possessory security interests, which maps to how BTC lending actually works,” Long explained.
15/ It still has a gaping hole. I'd encourage Texas to amend HB4474 to incorporate #Wyoming's language around possessory security interests, which maps to how #BTC lending actually works. Possession/control of a private key is EVERYTHING in BTC. Paper filings are a joke
— Caitlin Long
(@CaitlinLong_) March 26, 2021
(@CaitlinLong_) She added that in Wyoming, the law clearly explains how liens on BTC can be enforced and allows for the cleansing of dormant liens. In contrast, HB 4474 only states that an innocent buyer will not become a subject of such claims due to the “take free” rule that frees purchasers from the security interest.
However, then it becomes unclear what would happen to already existing crypto liens after HB 4474 potentially comes into effect.
“So…if the Texas law passes as proposed, it will probably create a lien mess where lenders may lose out on their VALID BTC liens. Enacting this bill may cause legit lenders to leave Texas (assuming the bill actually becomes law, over the VALID objections of lenders),” Long noted.
In his turn, Lee Bratcher, president of the Texas Blockchain Council, told CoinTelegraph that while some concerns still remain, the bill could receive additional amendments to address these issues in the future.
He added, “We are working to produce a framework that moves in the same direction as Wyoming, and we will be following up with additional legislation in the future.”
